No, no, of course I don’t mean I read TOO MUCH in general, too many books over the course of the year. There’s no such thing, is there? There’s no better thing than reading lots of books (hobby: no better hobby; obviously it’s better to be running around giving all your possessions to Good Causes and generally doing good, but you know what I mean).
But I haven’t really finished many books recently – my last review was THIRTEEN DAYS ago and I’ve only finished one book since then, which is waiting to be reviewed. I do have gaps, but this seems particularly shocking. So I have started to wonder if it’s the number of books I am reading concurrently that’s messing things up a bit.
Here’s the thing: do you read one book at a time, or many? And, here’s the most important thing: do you think you’re more ‘productive’ if you only read one at a time – do you actually get through MORE books that way?
This is what I’ve always said I have on the go at any one time:
- One larger or more “special” book (maybe a Persephone or hardback) which I read in the house, at the breakfast table, etc. This sometimes extends into two books, for example I won’t read a Persephone while eating, so I might have a Persephone on the night stand and a political biography, say, at the table.
- One smaller and more portable book for in my handbag when popping into Birmingham or going on longer journeys. Now I’m trying to actually READ the books I have packed onto my Kindle, this can take electronic or paper form.
That should be doable, shouldn’t it. But the problem is, it doesn’t really work like that. Here’s what I’m reading at the moment …
- Friday to Saturdayish I’m reading the New Statesman on my tablet at the table. Sunday to Tuesdayish, it’s the Saturday Guardian newspaper. Sometimes there’s a bit of struggling slowly through an Icelandic newspaper going on with the tablet, too, although that’s usually upstairs near my dictionaries. I LOVE the New Statesman and I have not once, in the year I’ve been subscribing, experienced Mag Lag with it (when you are still reading the last issue when the new one arrives), even though it’s an (almost) weekly. I like the e-version of the newspaper because I can skim it more. But these two do take away time from reading at the table.
- I’m currently reading a big fat 19th century novel on the Kindle, which a friend lent to me in paper form, but I wasn’t doing well with the huge unwieldy paperback, so I downloaded a free copy from manybooks.net. I’m reading this at the table and in bed, and on the bus.
- I have a book of essays from newspapers that I’m reading at the gym. Often the gym book is the same as the handbag book, but I don’t want to sweat all over my Kindle, so started this. I cycle and read for about an hour to 90 minutes a week, so that’s not going to get through much book, even at my speed of reading (for those concerned about my ability to read and exercise vigorously, I do an odd and self-invented form of interval training whereby I pedal very much harder every 5th page).
- I have a hardback book on the history of the Tube which I picked off the TBR to look at and haven’t really looked at properly yet.
- I have the terrible, terrible shame of Iris Murdoch’s book on Sartre, which isn’t very big but is a bit too difficult for me – so it’s “being read” but then being hidden on the back sofa under a pile of handbags …
I think that’s it, and it doesn’t seem too bad. Is it just because I’m reading a big novel that I’ve got a bit stuck and low on the reviewing front? Should I just knuckle down and read one at a time? After all, I don’t have a problem with “having” to read a particular book, as I read my TBR in acquisition order and don’t get to make many choices based on reading mood there. Or should I carry on as I am?
How do you do it? Have you noticed yourself getting through more books using one method or the other, single or many reads, if you’ve tried both? Or should I just go on holiday or get a cold and get them all finished?
Oct 17, 2014 @ 07:55:07
I forever have lots of books on the go. Main book for bus every day, two or three things in Kindle app on iPad for odd moments or a change, usually a commentary or devotional for first thing in morning, Czech (parallel and simplified) Jane Eyre (or Tom Sawyer or Hound of Baskervilles) for one page a night before sleep, and then often a game book I’m reading as background or inspiration for my own writing…
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 08:22:57
Hi Timothy, I think it’s your first post here so welcome! It’s good to know I’m not the only juggler! I did “The Hobbit” in French, one page a day, for a bit, but it didn’t go too well as I just didn’t have the vocab!
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 08:58:34
Well, my Czech vocab isn’t that great. That’s why I get parallel text versions with the English on one side! But the delight when I read a whole sentence I understand is great
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 09:05:31
I’m at that stage with my Icelandic, although if I hit something only in language used before about 1500, I’m fine! The problem with “The Hobbit” was that I have a reasonably large French vocabulary, but it doesn’t stretch so far for the orc/goblin/sword stuff!
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 08:05:59
Oh no! Liz, I hope you are not caught up in the target culture. How about going cold turkey and spending a weekend somewhere interesting with a good companion, good food and the only reading matter the sauce bottle on the table. If you could bear it, it might help put matters in perspective. Sounds as if you need time out for reflection. I’m intrigued…what is the Big Victorian novel? Whatever you decide this an interesting post that affects all us readers. Thank you.
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 08:24:57
Not so much target culture as having so much on my shelf I want to get to! I couldn’t bear to go cold turkey, but I do think I need a reading weekend and will try to manage one soon. The large book is “The Heavenly Twins” by Sarah Grand – all very much about feminism and the start of the New Woman and a cracking good story, too!
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 09:02:03
Wow – you’re juggling a lot of different reading there! I used to have more than one book on the go, but I found it wasn’t working and as I get older I’m finding it easier to have just one at a time – that way, I *am* actually finishing them (or definitely abandoning them) rather than leaving them in limbo. I have a *lot* of half read books that suffered that way. And I pretty much abandoned magazines and newspapers because I was never getting through them. One book at a time *is* really working for me at the moment – although I know what you mean about not reading certain books when you eat. I have a lovely old first edition I haven’t really got round to reading because of that. Maybe I could stretch to two books side by side… 🙂
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 09:06:51
Interesting – thank you. I don’t have too many “limbo” books, apart from the IM one – the large one was getting left but not now I’ve got going on the Kindle. I think I’ll definitely sit myself down for an hour with the IM over the weekend and see how I go once that’s out of the way. Then, I’ll clear them all up, then start with a clean slate and see what I fancy doing!
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 11:39:18
I rarely read more than one boolk at a time. For the last couple of months I have been dipping into a massive Truman Capote collection but I rarely actually pick it up. I usually just concentrate on one at a time. I would never finish anything otherwise.
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 12:20:56
Yes, you’re good at that and get through a lot, don’t you. But what if you’re reading something that’s too big to go with you on the bus?? I think I am going, as I said above, to finish what I’ve got going on now (one by one) then try one at a time for a bit and see what happens. Apart from the big book / bus conundrum. And taking the Kindle on trips.
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 13:39:57
preference: read one at a time, so I can really get into it.
reality: since I’ve jumped into [the deep end] of this thing called a writing career, I no longer have that luxury. I am at present, marketing one book, formulating its sequel, hashing the story that is shelved in favor of said sequel, spinning my tale for NaNoWriMo [which I’m told (by the characters of course) will be a trilogy!) AND reading for a) pleasure ’cause I love to read; and b) to write reviews; and C) beta reading – I’ve three I’m reading concurrently at present!!!!!
still, preference would be curled up with a cup of coffee or tea, with one singular book (story) playing in the theatre of my mind. ahhhh, the “good ol’ days…..” wink wink
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 13:45:28
Interesting – I’ve always read a few at a time, and that hasn’t changed with the editing/transcribing and now also writing career (time for reading dipped sharply but I’m bringing it up again). But it would be nice to go back to the weekends of reading I used to have! And yes, beta reads and reads for review cut into pure pleasure time, don’t they!
LikeLike
Oct 17, 2014 @ 19:34:13
I have always been astonished by your multiple books on the go and wondered how you manage that and why you like it. Your post did not exactly answer that question. I thought that the post from kaggsysbookishramblings held great relevance for me. One at a time is definitely my preference. When the book is good for me it makes the characters more alive for me. Equally, when I suspect the book might be discarded after my obligatory 60 rule the decision comes more easily when it is the only book I am reading.
I’m not into the counting numbers of books as I read so a good total at year’s end is simply proof of the great meaning of reading in my life. I’m glad it is not a chore.
LikeLike
Oct 18, 2014 @ 06:28:50
How I manage it is by having quite different books on the go at one time – I’d get confused if I was reading two similar Viragoes, for instance. By default, the larger mealtime book will often be a non-fiction – a political biography, or something on the Tube, and the handbag book is likely to be travel or fiction. I do it for practical reasons to do with the physicality of the books. And I seem to be able to give up just fine, however many others I’m reading – if I don’t like something, I will stop it pretty well there and then, rather than setting it aside to see if I like it more later, if that makes sense.
It’s never a chore and I’m a bit surprised it came over like that – I’m just so keen to keep reading new (or re-reading old and loved) books and sometimes it feels like I’m stuck in the middle of millions of the things!
LikeLike
Oct 19, 2014 @ 19:48:57
I seem to get through a book most quickly when I have just one and I’m really caught up in it. I’m struggling with Donna Tartt’s The Goldfinch at the moment because it’s so big I find it hard to take anywhere with me!
LikeLike
Oct 20, 2014 @ 08:56:41
Ah, yes, that’s the thing – what do you do when you are out and about and can’t take your big book with you? I can’t see myself ever always reading just one, as I have some biggies coming up on the shelf. Unless you take a special extra book bag around with you at all times …
LikeLike
Oct 24, 2014 @ 02:32:05
Wow, it’s amazing that you’re able to get through so many pieces of writing and reading at once. I also adore the fifth-page push that you mention – sometimes I read my Kindle when I jog, because it would be too hard to flip pages while running a 7-minute-mile without things getting messy. For me, because I’m currently studying English as an undergrad, I usually read one book for school and one book for fun; depending on the intensity of the books I tend to only focus on one at a time. For my current creative writing class I’ve been reading a bunch of short stories, which has also been a new and fulfilling experience.
Anyway, enough at me. I’m glad that you’re aware of your bookish habits enough to write about them in a well-honed blog post. (:
LikeLike
Oct 24, 2014 @ 07:37:06
Goodness, I don’t think I could run and read at the same time, especially not that fast, but the exercise bike (esp the more comfortable recumbent one) is perfect for that!
I admire you being able to read for pleasure while studying. I can’t remember doing that myself; I can remember being totally OFF books for a couple of months after finishing my English degree; the first things I went back to were children’s classics such as the Arthur Ransome “Swallows and Amazons” books! So well done to you for continuing your reading as I’m sure it gives better balance.
I’m not the biggest fan of the short story myself, but do enjoy the more classic, story-driven ones – like those of Hardy, Edith Wharton, etc.
And watch out for my next post where I reveal what happened next with that BIG book …
LikeLike
Book reviews – “Period Piece” and “Moranthology” plus a shiny new book | Adventures in reading, writing and working from home
Oct 24, 2014 @ 07:01:56
Book reviews – The Heavenly Twins and Ten Pound Pom | Adventures in reading, writing and working from home
Oct 28, 2014 @ 18:56:57
State of the TBR November 2014 | Adventures in reading, writing and working from home
Nov 02, 2014 @ 10:01:42
Book reviews – “Period Piece” and “Moranthology” plus a shiny new book | Adventures in reading, running and working from home
Nov 16, 2021 @ 08:59:35