This is such a funny one for me to review. Because I studied it for half of my research project (find out more here), I know more about what other people think of this book than certainly any other Murdoch, and probably any other book in the world. The thing that surprised me most about the outcomes of getting 25 book groups to read the book is that so many of them saw it through the lens of modern-day events and preoccupations, some describing Michael as a predatory paedophile, with many fewer taking exception to the much more clearly evidenced instance of drunk driving. While there has been writing about Michael (notably by Pamela Osborn) I still push back against his actively predatory nature.
Reader Peter Rivenberg has sent me some fabulous cover images from his copies, including our first French one! The first one has an image from the BBC production, which I’ve never seen. Is that supposed to be Dora and Paul?
Do please share any other cover images you’ve got of your copies of this one – although surely there can’t be any MORE editions? Tweet them to me, pop them on Facebook for my attention or use the email address you can find on my Contact Form.
Iris Murdoch – “The Bell”
(14 October 2017)
Another delight to read (fortunately – I think I’ve settled in to realising I’m not going to come to the conclusion I’ve stopped loving IM’s novels now). And once again, my allegiances have shifted. I used to think Dora was the heroine, and she is allowed to grow and change and develop into service and perhaps deeper thought and less frivolousness. I’d completely forgotten that she actually had an affair with Noel, and IM is pretty horrible to her, with lots of asides of things like of course she hadn’t bothered to look up the railway timetable. I used to have more time for Michael, but I became annoyed with the way he falls into issues and scenes because of not thinking things through or considering the consequences, surely an example of IM’s keenness on ‘attention’. We see his thought processes over Nick and Toby, changing his mind and bringing himself round to be in the right. But I can’t see him as predatory or an actual paedophile as such, as Nick is 15 (yes, I know, but we’re not talking children) and Toby 18. He is also described as “having no time for philosophical speculation” (p. 118) just as he starts examining what it is to be good. I used to find Mrs Mark amusing, but she’s AWFUL, isn’t she. Coy and passive-aggressive and just dreadful.
Of course I still love the nuns, aquatic and otherwise, with their no-nonsense good humour and firm but simple faith. They pay attention to what’s necessary and step in only when needed.
The Murdoch themes are all there, curly hair, cut hair, twins / siblings, stones, water, complicated arrangements, the contrast of London and the country. There are lots of echoes, from the three sermons (James’, Michael’s and Nick’s twisted one) and Dora loses her shoes twice, there are two bells, and Imber and the Abbey, of course.
There’s humour again, of course, as there always is (isn’t there?). For example, Dora on the train:
She decided not to give up her seat.
She got up and said to the standing lady, ‘Do sit down here, please. I’m not going very far, and I’d much rather stand anyway.’ (p. 11)
I find Dora’s reaction to her first sight of the nuns really funny, too:
… she now made out with an unpleasant shock a shapeless pile of squatting black cloth that must be a nun. (p. 28)
The use of the word “rebarbative” was noted by my group of friends who did the last chronological read, and by my study participants. But what I hadn’t realised is that it’s only ever Toby who is associated with this word, which serves to remind us when we’re seeing things through his eyes. This reminded me that certain scenes are also only seen through the eyes of a perhaps more unreliable narrator, Michael. So even though there’s supposed to be an omniscient narrator here, we are constantly in the characters’ heads, meaning that truth shifts and can be doubted.
There are some lovely little nods to other novels. Hugo Bellfounder cast the original bell (cf. “Under the Net”). When Dora leaves Catherine in the garden, picking apricots, she refers to her as “the figure under the net” (p. 70). And we have yet another chase of a women in pale garments in the darkness of a forest, when Dora pursues Catherine.
Who is the enchanter in this novel? Well, the Bell itself certainly enchants Dora,
She had communed with it now for too long and was under its spell. She had thought to be its master and make it her plaything, but now it was mastering her and would have its will. (p. 277)
and Michael seems to attract devotion, but only perhaps from those who are unstable in one way or another (Catherine, about to break down, and Toby, still sorting out his own personality; I don’t think Dora counts as she loves him at the end of the book in a different and perhaps purer way).
The saints are not easy to find, either. Perhaps Patchway is our saint – when we first meet him, he’s described as
A dirty looking man with a decrepit hat on, who looked as if he did not belong and was indifferent to not belonging. (p. 33)
He is described later has having the ability to stand by and say nothing, “and yet existing, large, present, and at ease” (p. 152) and at the climax of the procession scene, stands deliberately in a place where he can’t see.
Perhaps Tallis is shadowing my readings, but dirt and indifference to tend to make a saint. James feels like an early foreshadowing of James Arrowby and other soldiers, but he’s very rigid in his beliefs as well as being humble. Peter Topglass communes with animals and seems to have a magic touch with birds, and also exhibits
… detachment, his absorption in his beloved studies, his absence of competitive vanity … he was a person who, like Chaucer’s gentle knight, was remarkable for harming no one. (p. 124)
Neither Patchway or Topglass do anything but absorb events then pass on through their own lives, not passing on any pain, a sure sign of a Murdochian saint. James has to go back to his vigorous Doing Good in the East End (does he run into Henry or Carel, I wonder?).
AS Byatt’s introduction to this novel in my edition is so long, scholarly and full of references that it would take an essay to write about it itself, so I’m going to leave it here. What a rich, satisfying and memorable read this was. I’m glad it was the one I introduced my book groups to.
OK, over to you! Please either place your review in the comments, discuss mine or others’, or post a link to your review if you’ve posted it on your own blog, Goodreads, etc. I’d love to know how you’ve got on with this book and if you read it having read others of Murdoch’s novels or this was a reread, I’d love to hear your specific thoughts on those aspects, as well as if it’s your first one!
If you’re catching up or looking at the project as a whole, do take a look at the project page, where I list all the blog posts so far.
Isabel
Feb 24, 2018 @ 01:22:37
I saw the tv series, and it is Dora (TessaPeake-Jones) on that book cover. I don’t know about the male character, as I really remember 2 characters; Dora the outsider, and the unstable Catherine (Trudi Styler).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 24, 2018 @ 08:27:14
Trudi Styler as Catherine? How odd!
LikeLike
Peter Rivenberg
Feb 25, 2018 @ 23:08:59
The back cover identifies the male character as Michael, played by Ian Holm, who had earlier played Martin in the film of A Severed Head.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:16:14
Oh, goodness, that is interesting, as I see Martin and Michael as looking quite similar in my head (will have to check the descriptions of Martin when I start that one) but NOT like Ian Holm in either case!
LikeLike
heavenali
Feb 24, 2018 @ 13:40:08
I remember The Bell quite well, it was one I really enjoyed. I don’t think I saw Michael as predatory though the relationship is quite typical of the many inappropriate or odd relationships in Murdoch’s work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 24, 2018 @ 14:45:20
I was a bit shocked when my participants were so angry about that aspect, but it does show that the text it to a large degree created by the reader, which is what I was trying to prove, so …. I remember you liking this one and I still think it’s a good introduction to her work.
LikeLike
Sarah
Feb 25, 2018 @ 02:12:30
The Bell is the only novel by Iris Murdoch I’ve read, and that was an eye-watering thirty years ago *gulp*. It’s perhaps not that surprising that I can’t remember much about it, but little glimmers of memory have been triggered by your post. I’m tempted to re-read it to find out what my older self makes of it all these years later!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:12:17
Oh, do, it’s such a fascinating process doing that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gerda Wiggemans
Feb 25, 2018 @ 08:51:17
Thanks for sharing your insights, very interesting! Looking forward to more posts on her work. BR A true, but Dutch,,,,,
Iris Murdoch fan, Gerda Wiggemans, Delft, Holland.
LikeLike
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:17:33
Thank you for your comment. The IM community is wide and varied, and I have met other Dutch fans!
LikeLike
buriedinprint
Feb 25, 2018 @ 17:18:39
I know what you mean about an introduction needing an entire post all its own and I can imagine what Byatt might have done with this novel. It wasn’t one for which there’s a circulating copy in our library system, but it looks as though I will be able to join in again with The Severed Head. (How wrong that sounds!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:13:05
That is a shame as it’s quite a popular one here and my reading groups were able to find it in their libraries. I look forward to you joining us for the Severed Head discussion!
LikeLike
Peter Rivenberg
Feb 26, 2018 @ 00:06:09
I had only read The Bell once before, long ago, after having read most of Murdoch’s other work at the time, and I found it rather hard to place, possibly because I was looking for enchanters everywhere and found it difficult to identify one here. My recollection of it revolved around Michael, Dora and Nick. Indeed I was surprised on rereading it to see that Nick’s part was relatively small (or at least it seemed rather small to me on this reading, though certainly significant and destructive, which may be why I found him so memorable).
I had almost totally forgotten Toby, who on this reading appeared to me to be the major character, at least for large chunks of the novel. I had forgotten how instrumental he was in the raising of the bell, and how impressively Murdoch gets into his mind, especially after the kiss as he tries to fall asleep. From initial amazement to disgust and repugnance, a bit of shame, to downplaying the significance, then to feeling a sense of power, then a new sense of Michael’s humanity, then back to wretchedness and confusion – she really delineates his feelings beautifully.
Indeed she does this for all her major characters, which I think is one reason I find rereading her multiple times so rewarding.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:15:00
I know what you mean about looking for enchanters, although I seem to be searching for saints more this time around. I know what you mean about Nick – he looms heavy over the book but doesn’t have as many scenes as you think. And I agree with you that this is one of the reasons re-reading Murdoch gives such rewards, as well as one’s shifting perspectives as one ages and the way she offers you characters to think about at all times in one’s life.
LikeLike
Ste J
Feb 26, 2018 @ 02:05:47
Yet another author that needs reading, so many, to read and so little time. I vaguely remember some sort of TV event but the book is always better!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 26, 2018 @ 11:16:38
Yes, The Bell had a TV series I’ve not seen. Murdoch is very rewarding …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kat
Feb 26, 2018 @ 22:22:08
I very much enjoyed your review. I did read this after reading Susan Hill’s Howards End Is on the Landing and loved it. So I’m not rereading this one, but do plan to go on to the selection in March. So glad you’ve organized this Murdoch readalong!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Feb 27, 2018 @ 13:06:35
Oh, that’s interesting, I do remember her mentioning IM a bit in that book. What did you think of it and did you review it at the time? I’m glad you’re enjoying the readalong and hope you get on well with A Severed Head!
LikeLike
“The Bell” round-up and “A Severed Head” preview #IMReadalong @IrisMurdoch | Adventures in reading, writing and working from home
Feb 28, 2018 @ 21:48:57
iconoclasticnan1
Mar 05, 2018 @ 23:24:02
Once again I am just going to comment very briefly. One thing I really like about IM is how liberal and non-judgmental and inclusive she was for the time she was writing. And by revealing to us the rounded and common humanity of characters such as Michael, we can identify or empathise rather than make the quick, harsh and stereotypical judgment of those readers’ groups. They are reading exactly the same book but coming from the new majority perspective of predatory monsters based on an arbitrary age of legality. Of course that is not to defend paedophilia in practice. It is to admire IM’s insights which are a preventative to ‘tabloid-style’ dehumanisation. I think the nuns represent this non-judgmental acceptance very clearly.
And that is my tuppence worth this time!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Mar 06, 2018 @ 08:52:52
Thank you for your comment, and I agree, and love the link between Murdoch and the nuns in their attitudes. I think the modern mores and obsessions got between the readers and the text, and it’s good to know not everybody thinks of the book like that (to be fair, not all my book groups or even all members of the particular groups did, but it was a very prevalent theme nonetheless).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz
Mar 11, 2018 @ 10:37:33
Here is a link to my review on Goodreads. Not very enthusiastic, I’m afraid – I seem to be one of the very few who could not get much out of this novel. I’m sure it’s me and not it! https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2323713478
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
Mar 11, 2018 @ 14:57:27
Thank you for sharing your review. We all have ones that are not favourites and actually one of those is coming up for me. The Bell is a tricky one because none of the characters ARE very appealing really, are they!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz
Mar 11, 2018 @ 20:03:25
Yes, there are bound to be highs and lows across so many books – one of the joys of reading the complete works 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
John P. Houghton
May 05, 2018 @ 15:34:04
Is ‘The Bell’ the most Murdochian of all her novels? I was asking myself this as I read The Bell. More precisely, as I was re-reading it, for the first time in something like 15 years.
Not the deepest philosophically, or most sustained in terms of narrative, or even just the most exciting in terms of pace and plotting.
But the one which displays all the essential elements of an Iris Murdoch fiction: the slightly otherworldly setting; the concern with truth, love and goodness; the delicately balanced way in which characters are both rounded personalities and advocate for a philosophical argument; the wordplay (I love how this critic slips in to her review Toby’s new favourite word ‘rebarbative’: https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2016/aug/11/books-to-give-you-hope-the-bell-by-iris-murdoch); and the familiar tropes (water, twins, woods, and so on).
The Bell feels perfectly formed and fully rounded, a work even more mature and self-assured than the ones we have encountered so far on the read-along adventure.
After finishing ‘The Bell’ I happened on a collection of reviews in Martin Amis’ ‘The War Against Cliché’ in which he states that “Murdoch’s prose covers all the options, chucking in a dozen careless phrases when one will do, she…attempts to evoke and dramatize by sheer accumulation”.
While this charge could be levelled at some of her later work, this is certainly not true of ‘The Bell’. The prose are not sparse, but nor are they sprawling. The longer passages are made so because so much is conveyed via naturalistic dialogue.
Finally, I was struck by the description in the above review that ‘The Bell’ is a novel that gives on hope, a work of “Wodehousian charm”. Did others feel like this? I felt it was a novel of equal darkness and light, concerned with sunken desires and shadowy impulses, as much as the pursuit of love and truth. It features a suicide, a deeply unhappy and ultimately failed marriage, a repressed man who gropes much younger men, and ultimately the destruction of an entire community.
Hardly Wodehousian wit and warmth, but maybe the rest of you perceived much more light through the trees than I did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liz Dexter
May 07, 2018 @ 18:17:51
Thank you for your thoughtful review. I think it is extremely Murdochian and perhaps that’s why it’s often recommended as a first IM to people (along with The Sea, The Sea). I’m not sure about the hopefulness in it, I suppose that Dora learns and grows and spreads her wings but most other people seem to stay true to themselves and go off and continue that elsewhere. Hm. But do we look for hope in IM? I’m not sure I do. Human interest and great stories and powerful characters, yes, and ways to be good, I suppose. And doesn’t good usually outweigh the bad … just?
LikeLike