Getting through my 20 Books of Summer books (intro post here) and finally almost finishing the exciting books I bought with my Christmas 2020 / Birthday 2021 book token splurge. (results pictured on 1 July 2021 – out of those books I have read most of them for either January’s Nordics challenge or Novellas in November last year, with one left to read soon and one reading with Emma in a while).
This is the eighth book I’ve completed from the 20 Books project (I’m reviewing them slightly out of order to make the next one coincide with a fellow-blogger’s review) and also comes off my TBR 2021-2022 challenge.
Mikki Kendall – “Hood Feminism: Notes from the Women White Feminists Forgot”
(30 June 2021 – book tokens)
We rarely talk about basic needs as a feminist issue. Food insecurity and access to quality education, safe neighborhoods, a living wage, and medical care are all feminist issues. Instead of a framework that focuses on helping women get basic needs met, all too often the focus is not on survival but on increasing privilege. For a movement that is meant to represent all women, it often centers on those who already have most of their needs met. (p. xv)
This book aims to address the issue of the women who are left out of feminism because within the movement, some women are oppressing others. It takes the reader through the real-life issues and problems for mainly poorer Black mainly women in the US and looks at where other women in the feminist movement can help by either getting involved or leaving people be and not interfering. There are clear assessments of problems and clear statements on how mainstream feminism can be of use, so there is a lot of value here.
Starting with making the good point that mainstream feminists often don’t stand in solidarity with the trans community or understand that women living in poverty and surviving have different priorities, applying “respectability politics” to ignore those doing work or living in ways we might not directly approve of or find valid.
You can’t be a feminist who ignores hunger. (p. 37)
Kendall takes us through the lives of women and girls (and men) in poorer Black neighbourhoods in the US. She also talks about Indigenous, Latinx and other communities that don’t exist in great numbers in the UK, and I would like to read a similar book located within the UK to appreciate the different things we need to concentrate on here (obviously a lot of issues overlap, but there will be ones specific to the larger South Asian communities in the UK, for example, and the usual differences in the roots of racism here, even if the outcomes are similar). Overlaps in perceived violence and the over-policing of ethnic groups, food insecurity, access to and support within education, understanding and non-judgement of those who can’t and don’t code-switch to fit “norms”, etc. are clear to see and throughout she calls for mainstream feminists to stand back, listen to what’s needed and help in ways that are called for by the people experiencing whatever issue it is (rather than rushing in and doing White Saviourism). And if we can’t do anything at the point of conflict at that time, “Well, you can always challenge the white patriarchy” (p. 84), something it’s obviously easier for us to use our white privilege to do. She also makes a powerful point about not assuming all Black women are strong and can be used to provide exemplars, but need support and compassion, too.
Kendall also calls out colourism and other classisms in Black communities (although this is something that needs calling out in wider society, too) and talks about what her own communities can do to redress this, with painful examples from her own experience (she weaves her own experience through the book, making the personal political in an entirely appropriate way).
A conflict or discomfort I had on reading the book, and I appreciate I’m at risk of practising White Exceptionalism here (“I’m special, I don’t do that!”), and also at risk of centring myself if I talk about all the things I do that are so noble and special, is that I don’t recognise my brand of feminism in the descriptions of mainstream feminism that Kendall presents. She specifically talks about it ignoring grassroots issues around poverty and cultures and concentrating on surnames, body hair and getting women into CEO positions. I’ve always taken an egalitarian and non-anti-men standpoint (yes, sure, I criticise men and definitely the patriarchy but also accept and value the role they have in women’s lives), pushing against separatism since I was a baby feminist at university and getting cancelled by the 2nd years for talking to men, and I’ve got behind campaigns around period poverty, funding refugee women to get bicycles and lessons in riding them, etc. I did try to concentrate on taking in the messages that I could use, though, with some hopefully non-me-centred examples below.
Here’s what Kendall says mainstream feminism can do:
Accomplice feminists would actively and directly challenge white supremacist people, policies, institutions, and cultural norms. They would know that they do not need to have the same statke in teh fight to work with marginalized communities. They would put aside their egos and their need to be centered in our struggles in favor of following our instructions, because they would internalize the reality that their privilege doesn’t make them experts in our oppression. (pp. 257-8)
Pieces I took away and commit to continuing to do in the spaces I can do it (e.g. not having a workplace to agitate in):
- Continue to address and call out / call in racism when you see it, even from women friends and allies in other areas.
- Continue to amplify and share Black and other Global Majority People’s voices and work.
- Interrogate your attitudes and make sure you’re applying compassion to all.
- Interrogate any feminist organisations you are part of to check they are doing the work to support everyone, at all levels, not just White, cisgender, “respectable” women to gain extra bits of privilege (I’ve checked into the Fawcett Society and found their list of help for individuals includes GMP-run services and those for homelessness, care leavers, etc., although nothing specifically for transwomen and that they’ve done a big recent report on Pay and Progression of Women of Colour, although that doesn’t seem to address women in informal economies; I’m going to start going to their regional meetings to know more about what I’m contributing funds to).
This was book number 8 in my 20 Books of Summer 2022!
This was also TBR Challenge 2021-22 Quarter 4 Book 2/28 – 26 to go!
Jul 08, 2022 @ 09:24:33
Some very interesting points here. Sometimes it seems the problems are so overwhelming its hard to know where to start. and if feminism addresses two or three points, it still leaves 1000 unanswered. Congratulations on galloping through your challenges.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 09:53:27
I’m working from the principle that it’s better to address two or three points than none, and that everyone has to do what they can do – e.g. I can use this platform to share lots of work by GMP writers and thinkers even if I’m not able to work from the inside of, for example, organised religion, politics or a workplace to effect change. And thank you, glad my challenges are going well: I’m pleased I’m almost “only” a year behind in my TBR; a bit shocked all the rest of the books on the shelf therefore arrived in the past year!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 10:23:18
What a really interesting post, Liz, and I suspect like you that a UK version might be quite different. What I see put out there as feminism is often not what I consider it to be, particularly as the focus which I first joined the movement was very much on world feminism and looking at the issues women had in different cultures and class. Class is, of course, at the root of so many of the divisions and I despair at white privileged feminism – we need to look at what people are having to deal with through different lenses. But it’s such a complex subject – and I remember falling out with people about political lesbianism, which I think I may have mentioned here before. However, with what’s going on in the US, I reckon if I was living there I might have to rethink my position…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 17:57:58
Yes, I’ve realised I’m not that familiar with US mainstream feminism. I think we have similar feminisms, even though I came in right at the end of the era you were in. I remember not liking the idea of political lesbianism as it felt a bit rude to actual lesbians by birth, although I do still know a few and I suppose it shows a certain commitment. I think we both come from a socialist viewpoint, which is counter to the liberal one and maybe contains more responsibility to pull up others to a more helpful level, seeing the masses of people needing help rather than just some.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 09, 2022 @ 10:01:54
Yes, that could be it. Although many of us wear the label of feminism, where we stand on the political spectrum could well influence how we interpret it. My feeling is that we need equality and fairness and freedom and a good standard of living for all – and I really don’t see why that should be impossible!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 09, 2022 @ 16:39:23
Yes, exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 12:02:33
I shouldn’t comment but I like you to know I read and thought about your post. I see feminists arguing about these things on Twitter, and of course I believe the more inclusive the better. I’ve spent most of my adult life having to adjust my socialism to take account of race (and women!).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 17:59:28
Oh, no, I’m very much keen on men engaging, especially ones like you who do interrogate their socialism and feminism and remain flexible and open to change and learning! I haven’t really seen the arguments on Twitter, apart from the horrible Terf stuff which I hope it’s clear I don’t subscribe to, from the sharing and highlighting I do here. Thank you for feeling this is a safe space where you can say something, actually: that makes me glad!
LikeLike
Jul 08, 2022 @ 14:51:16
Interesting – I have to say this puts me off a bit ‘I don’t recognise my brand of feminism in the descriptions of mainstream feminism that Kendall presents.’ I had the same problem with the chapter on feminism in Reni Eddo-Lodge’s Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race – I felt there was much to say about racism within a wide range of feminisms, not just this narrow kind of liberal feminism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 18:00:28
I have a feeling you might share the more socialist rather than liberal perspective of me and Kaggsy. I remember that chapter, too, and yes. But there was a lot of value in this book, too, although I would like to read (but can’t currently find) a UK work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 20:21:15
Definitely!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 08, 2022 @ 17:39:19
The point on self assessment is a very relevant one and something we need to apply regularly in our quests to read, understand and practice.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jul 08, 2022 @ 18:01:42
Yes, and doing the work to educate ourselves, e.g. my quest to gain a better understanding of transwomen’s and drag artists’ performance of femininity by doing some reading and self-education.
LikeLike
Jul 08, 2022 @ 19:40:58
This does sound really fascinating and raises some really interesting and important points. I think a UK equivalent book would be a great companion piece raising quite different issues.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 09, 2022 @ 16:40:01
Some different and some similar. I just can’t find a UK-based one, though, it’s quite frustrating!
LikeLike
Jul 10, 2022 @ 17:16:19
Liz, this sounds like a very interesting read. I’ve seen this book discussed on Instagram frequently, but I’ve never got a chance to read it. Kendall raises many essential points, and it would be fascinating if you found a UK equivalent. What I loved about this review is how you challenged yourself at the end and are holding yourself accountable. Books that I consider 5-star reads are the ones that shine a light on a new perspective and challenge me to be better. Great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 10, 2022 @ 17:54:10
I can’t find a UK equivalent at the moment; I’d settle for a very detailed read by a Black British person or someone who had spent time in both countries. I know some issues will overlap and some will be different. And thank you – that means a lot. I try to learn and hold myself accountable even if I can’t recognise everything I see in what I read about “my” feminism. From the comments, I think it’s a political and possibly an age thing, and younger liberal feminists are different and acting in these ways, which is not good! I’m really glad Kendall wrote this book and I became aware of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 10, 2022 @ 19:12:03
You are welcome! What it means to be a feminist seems to be a hot topic nowadays, but maybe it’s always been a hot topic?! Nevertheless, it’s a topic I find intriguing, and I’m happy to come across new books on it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 11, 2022 @ 05:49:50
Oh, yes – I was having arguments with separatist feminists and political lesbians (i.e. straight women who adopted lesbianism as a political statement) about whether a very nice and gentle man who wanted to learn should be allowed in a completely standard university class in 1990!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 11, 2022 @ 11:28:38
Oh wow, sounds like it was a heated debate!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 10, 2022 @ 18:35:25
This sounds excellent, LIz, with some practical calls to action, which is always great to see. It’s the type of book I would listen to if it popped up on Radio 4’s Book of the Week (my preferred way of experiencing this type of issue-related non-fiction).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 11, 2022 @ 05:50:54
Yes, I’m always glad to find practical calls to action I can apply to my own life situation (difficult when they’re all about how to affect your workplace, I have to say!). And that’s interesting. I can’t take information in well that way, so I am glad you have that method!
LikeLike
Jul 11, 2022 @ 07:51:32
For some reason, I find issue-based non-fiction much easier to listen to than read, possibly because I’m a podcast person, especially if I’m walking someone on my own. Fiction, on the other hand, I prefer to read from a book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 17, 2022 @ 23:58:29
Amazing review of a wonderful book! So glad you read this one and I agree with and appreciate all of your four tangible takeaways toward the end of the book. I also think it’s okay to honor the ways in which your activism has taken into account issues of class and poverty, because it sounds like you do so while recognizing that ideally that would be the baseline for everyone in engaging in feminist activism. I’ve missed reading/commenting on your reviews as frequently and it’s nice to see you continue using your platform to promote books like this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jul 18, 2022 @ 05:32:14
Thank you for your kind and supportive comment! The discussion in the comments has shown me this might be a legacy of politics / my age and first experience of feminism, which is interesting but shouldn’t necessarily be the case! And I appreciate you popping by, I know you’ve been super-busy with the start of your residency!
LikeLiked by 1 person